The Nature of the Sun
Eight couplets preserve the ruby sky, Nowruz garden, golden shield and garment of light.
The chapter in five texts
| Text | Chapter treatment and distinctive choices |
|---|---|
| F&R English | Eight couplets preserve the ruby sky, Nowruz garden, golden shield and garment of light. |
| Moscow | The shorter main sequence is supplemented by relevant apparatus readings. |
| Mohl | The fuller solar imagery directly supports English couplets 4–6. |
| Ganjoor | Five couplets provide a shorter sequence; three English image passages therefore need other Persian references. |
| Khaleghi | The ruby sky and Nowruz garden precede the Sun-and-Moon heading; the light-giving body, golden shield, garment and night sequence follow it. The English solar imagery is supported across that boundary. |
Parallel text
English left · Persian right. Persian: Ganjoor unless the individual source label specifies otherwise. Numbers open the relevant note; source-only rows show absorbed or unmatched material.
Argument and poetic form
The sun is presented through substance, adornment, movement and address. The English’s fuller eight-couplet sequence preserves the shield and garment absent from the shorter digital section; comparison with print provides the necessary positive evidence.
The closing apostrophe changes description into a personal appeal. Its possible patronal resonance remains a reading rather than an identification proved by the line. The directional terms are interpreted within the poem’s historical vocabulary.
Couplet commentary
Quoted text · evidence · interpretation1–3Ruby sky and living light+
Ganjoor 1–3; Moscow I p 17; Mohl reprint I pp 6–7; Khaleghi I p 8, including the two lines above the Sun-and-Moon heading. Chapter headings do not define identical textual boundaries.
The ruby sky and the denial that it is made of water, dust, wind or smoke belong to the Persian source image. The English retains the conspicuous mineral color and the adorned-garden comparison rather than substituting an abstract description of beauty. Nowruz gives the garden a particular season and cultural setting.
In the consulted Khaleghi volume, the ruby-sky and garden couplets are printed immediately before the combined Sun-and-Moon heading (p 8). Their position does not mean that Khaleghi lacks them. The earlier review’s suggestion of a replacement by a warning about heavenly anger is withdrawn: that warning belongs to the preceding human/cosmic counsel and its variants.
4–6Golden shield and light as clothing+
Ganjoor chapter 5; Moscow I printed pp 17–18; Khaleghi I printed pp 8–9. Mohl reprint I printed pp 6–7.
Mohl p 7 prints the golden shield, luminous garment and eastward arrival of night used in English 4–6. Moscow pp 17–18 gives related lines in its apparatus rather than all in its main text. K p 8 retains related imagery in its main text. G’s sun section has only five couplets. These English images are textually grounded; the comparison positively defends their retention.
Shield and garment give the sun two different actions: it rises as a bright, rounded object, then clothes the earth in light. Keeping both preserves the source’s changing scale, from the heavenly body itself to its effect on the inhabited world. The fuller comparison establishes continuity rather than decorative expansion unsupported by Persian.
6–8Directions and the change to address+
Ganjoor chapter 5; Moscow I printed pp 17–18; Khaleghi I printed pp 8–9. Mohl reprint I printed pp 6–7.
The directional vocabulary of khavar and bakhtar varies in historical use and across the displayed readings. English consistently gives sunrise in the East and westward setting. Its last couplet preserves the source’s sudden apostrophe to an unshining sun. A personal or patronal resonance is possible, but is not proved by these lines alone.
New Naqqali