Iraj Is Slain
Iraj’s renunciation fails against a hatred that no concession can satisfy. The murder makes the limits of political and familial speech brutally visible.
The chapter in five texts
| Text | Chapter treatment and distinctive choices |
|---|---|
| F&R English | Forty-seven couplets preserve Iraj’s full moral appeal, the ant argument and the distinction between murderer and co-conspirator. |
| Moscow | The murder is a central main-text event; additional pleading material requires local distinction from the shorter reference. |
| Mohl | The inspected pp 79–81 carry the murder; p 80 supports the ant plea absent from Ganjoor. |
| Ganjoor | Sh10 has 43 couplets. It carries the murder and narrator’s lament but has no separate ant couplet. |
| Khaleghi | P 120 retains the ant plea in the main text with مکش موری, “do not kill an ant,” rather than Mohl’s میازار موری, “do not harm an ant.” |
Parallel text
English left · Persian right. Ganjoor is the reference except where a row names a printed source. Select a number to open the relevant note. G identifiers distinguish digital sections across chapter boundaries.
Narrative and poetic form
The English’s added space is most effective as a sequence of failed appeals. The golden chair and boot-hidden blade make the catastrophe physical, while the ant argument states the moral premise that the killers refuse.
Couplet commentary
Quoted text · evidence · interpretation1–10An accusation after a false welcome
The brothers approach at dawn; Iraj runs lovingly to meet them. Tur then indicts the territorial division.
The English retains the asymmetry of intent. Iraj does not enter a fair contest about shares: one party is still attempting reconciliation while the others have already planned a killing.
11–20Renunciation without safety
Iraj offers to relinquish Iran, China, the West, crown and arms, preferring life and peace to royal rivalry.
The offer removes the stated material grievance, exposing the deeper drive to destroy the person. The verse’s accumulated negatives are functional: each abandoned possession leaves less excuse for violence.
21–29The chair becomes a weapon
The source turns from argument to the golden seat as a weapon; Iraj pleads for life even without sovereignty.
The royal object used to strike him makes the crime an inversion of kingship. The English’s direct speech keeps Iraj a moral agent to the end, not a silent emblem of innocence.
30The ant and the right to livePrinted support; absent from digital reference
Mohl p 80 prints the ant couplet within Iraj’s plea. It has no separate couplet in the captured Ganjoor sh10. Khaleghi p 120 also retains the small-creature plea in the main text, but reads “Do not kill the little ant that gathers sustenance.” This is a local wording difference within a shared appeal, not general omission of the appeal from the printed editions.
The movement from a prince’s life to an ant’s life gives the plea universal reach: power does not create the basic value of living. The English’s inclusion has textual support, whatever judgment a future detailed transmission study may reach.
31–39Tur kills; both brothers bear responsibility
The boot-drawn blade, final attack, severing of the head and preparation of the head for dispatch complete the murder. Several actions are expanded in English.
The narrative identifies Tur as the immediate killer. Salm’s prior design and participation remain part of the crime. Embalming or perfuming the head prepares a terrible message; it is not an act of compassion that mitigates the killing.
40–47The narrator’s judgment
The closing address turns to the unfaithful world and records the dispatch of the head. English gives the curse and its aftermath additional scope.
The lament is not speech continuing from the now-dead Iraj. Its shift of speaker enlarges a family crime into a question about worldly justice without erasing the named killers’ responsibility.
New Naqqali