Jandal Goes to Yemen
The marriage embassy turns private succession into diplomacy: Fereydoon seeks three sisters for three sons, while Jandal must reconcile royal purpose with another father’s attachment.
The chapter in five texts
| Text | Chapter treatment and distinctive choices |
|---|---|
| F&R English | Eighty-one couplets expand the embassy’s persuasion and paternal psychology; naming statements become betrothal language in two places. |
| Moscow | The embassy and Yemen’s resistance appear in the reign narrative. Its printed presentation is a comparison text, not an independent vote alongside every digital reading. |
| Mohl | The fuller family-centered petition on pp 61–62 helps explain the English’s greater extent. |
| Ganjoor | Sh2 has 70 couplets and explicitly describes the sons and daughters as not yet named. |
| Khaleghi | The marriage embassy occupies the main text; its account also retains naming language, so the English substitution should remain visible. |
Parallel text
English left · Persian right. Ganjoor is the reference except where a row names a printed source. Select a number to open the relevant note. G identifiers distinguish digital sections across chapter boundaries.
Narrative and poetic form
The expansion is most persuasive where it sustains the exchange between two fathers. The clear reservation concerns naming: a reasonable narrative emphasis on marriage should not erase the Persian’s explicit preparation for the later naming scene.
Couplet commentary
Quoted text · evidence · interpretation1–8Three sons and the question of namesLocal semantic difference
Ganjoor says that the sons are grown and that their father has not yet given them names. English 5 gives “Not yet betrothed.” The sons’ naming is narrated explicitly in A6.6.
The English directs attention toward the marriage plot, which is the immediate subject, but betrothal is not the lexical meaning of the source’s naming statement. The note preserves that distinction without disturbing the verse.
9–17Jandal’s commission
The instruction asks for daughters of one father, royal lineage and beauty appropriate to the princes. Ganjoor’s commission occupies a shorter space than the English.
The pairing of three brothers and three sisters is a designed dynastic symmetry. The English makes selection criteria explicit while preserving the envoy’s subordinate role: Jandal searches and reports; he does not choose the marriages independently.
18–29An envoy’s praise as diplomatic argument
The journey, discovery of Yemen’s three daughters, royal audience and initial praise correspond to the reference sequence. Jandal’s description of Fereydoon is formal reported speech.
The elevated compliments belong to negotiation, where praise prepares a difficult demand. Reading them as the narrator’s unqualified description would flatten the dramatic voice. Rhyming amplification suits an embassy whose force depends on ceremonious persuasion.
30–41The value of children: a fuller petition
Mohl pp 61–62 carries a fuller argument about children, affection and the fortunate father around the embassy’s petition. The aligned Ganjoor passage is shorter. The Persian excerpt identifies the familial premise without pretending to transcribe the whole longer speech.
The English gives the appeal room to breathe: it approaches Sarv through fatherhood before asking him to surrender his daughters to distant marriages. Its length is therefore part of the diplomatic strategy, not evidence by itself of arbitrary English invention.
42–51Kinship and an interpretive substitutionNaming versus betrothal
The proposal identifies both groups as three unnamed royal children in Ganjoor 37–38. English 47 presents the daughters’ unpledged state. The surrounding appeal joins the two houses.
As in the opening, the English emphasizes marriage eligibility where the Persian explicitly mentions naming. The dynastic sense remains intelligible, but the source detail should be available to the reader rather than absorbed into a claim of exact verbal equivalence.
52–61The proposal meets paternal resistance
Jandal’s demand for the daughters is followed by the Yemen king’s inward distress. The plea and the king’s private response occupy different voices.
The verse preserves a consequential tension: the embassy presents marriage as an honor, while the father experiences it as loss. Sarv’s resistance is comprehensible before it becomes dangerous; this prepares the tests without excusing them.
62–69What power leaves unsaid
Ganjoor’s sequence gives the king’s dilemma: the superior king cannot easily be refused, yet his daughters cannot easily be relinquished. English redistributes the counsel and inner debate.
The pressure is political as well as emotional. Explanatory emphasis on Sarv’s predicament is defensible; it makes clear why diplomatic consent cannot be read as uncomplicated enthusiasm.
70–81A courteous postponement
The king conceals his anger, orders hospitality and asks time to consult. The English extends the formal exchange and its close.
Hospitality creates a pause, not a completed settlement. The couplets preserve the contrast between an outwardly gracious court and unresolved private anxiety. That contrast drives the next chapter.
New Naqqali