Salm and Tur Send a Message to Their Father
The brothers’ ultimatum travels through a blameless envoy to a court that continues to observe the obligations of hospitality.
The chapter in five texts
| Text | Chapter treatment and distinctive choices |
|---|---|
| F&R English | Forty-six couplets give the ultimatum and its delivery a separate dramatic chapter. |
| Moscow | The ultimatum and reception continue within the family dispute, with the bearer distinct from the senders. |
| Mohl | Pp 72–74 preserve the sharp message against a courteous royal reception. |
| Ganjoor | Sh6.34–77 supplies the continuous reference for the embassy. |
| Khaleghi | The corresponding main-text sequence retains the moralized threat and the envoy’s protected speaking role. |
Parallel text
English left · Persian right. Ganjoor is the reference except where a row names a printed source. Select a number to open the relevant note. G identifiers distinguish digital sections across chapter boundaries.
Narrative and poetic form
The strongest feature is controlled contrast between the sons’ imperious words and their father’s courtesy to an innocent bearer. The parentage formula deserves a local note because its English wording can otherwise seem to contradict the earlier family account.
Couplet commentary
Quoted text · evidence · interpretation1–9A threat framed as moral counsel
The brothers choose a Mobad, meet privately, set filial shame aside and begin their message with fear of God and the irreversibility of age.
Pious form does not establish a just claim. The English preserves the calculated inversion by which disobedient sons instruct their father in moral duty while pressing a threat.
10–18Equality asserted, not demonstratedParentage wording
The message denies any greater merit in Iraj. Ganjoor says “we are not less than he in mother and father”; English 17 says “One mother and one father gave us birth.” The earlier narrative distinguishes the sons’ maternity.
A claim of equal parentage or birth-worth is stronger in the English as a literal shared-mother statement. Since Salm and Tur themselves share maternity, “us” can designate the elder pair; it should not be turned into a new genealogy for all three. The assertion remains partisan.
19–25The ultimatum
The demands remove Iraj’s crown, assign him a remote portion and threaten destruction of Iran and Iraj if refused. English 21 states the peace conditional on compliance.
The threat is coercive before the murder ever occurs. The explanatory conditional makes its logic clear; the envoy’s ritual departure does not imply his assent to the policy.
26–34The envoy sees sovereign order
Palace height, noble ranks, lions, leopards and elephants precede the envoy’s admission. The English redistributes the spectacle.
This courtly abundance is political theater experienced through the messenger’s eyes. It answers the brothers’ assumption that an aging ruler is already powerless.
35–46Courtesy before anger
The Shah’s appearance, gracious seating, concern for his sons and inquiry after the road precede permission to deliver the harsh message.
The English retains the envoy’s claim of innocence. A messenger transmits another’s words: the distinction between speaker, bearer and recipient is essential to the scene and to the king’s ensuing answer.
New Naqqali