Rudabeh and Her Handmaidens
Rudabeh chooses a man known by report and refuses to let her attendants’ fear make the decision for her. Their eventual service follows her insistence.
The chapter in five texts
| Text | Chapter treatment and distinctive choices |
|---|---|
| F&R English | Seventy-two couplets combine two digital sections and retain a fuller warning and Rudabeh’s extended analogies. |
| Moscow | Pp 159–163 carry the household scene and resistance; p 160 brackets the extra warning about praising men. |
| Mohl | Pp 124–127 support the warning, preference analogies and Mai against Ganjoor’s Rai. |
| Ganjoor | Sh5 has 24 and sh6 41 couplets, combined here as 65. |
| Khaleghi | The corresponding household and attendants’ scenes fall within pp 186–191; its editorial selection should not be conflated with Mohl’s fuller continuous text. |
Parallel text
English left · Persian right. Ganjoor is the reference except where a row names a printed source. Select a number to open the relevant note. G identifiers distinguish digital sections across chapter boundaries.
Narrative and poetic form
The independent force of Rudabeh’s choice is source-based. A fuller English defense can be grounded in her own stated criterion, while the local Rai/Mai difference is traced to a printed reading.
Couplet commentary
Quoted text · evidence · interpretation1–12Two suns in the women’s quarters
Mehrab’s homecoming introduces Rudabeh and Sindokht; the queen asks whether Zal belongs to throne or nest.
The English names the two women in separate couplets and gives the question dramatic space. The nest invokes the hero’s actual fosterage, but its use as an alternative to legitimate rule also exposes a social prejudice.
13–21The father himself undoes the stigma
Mehrab praises Zal’s strength, generosity and intelligence, identifies white hair as the single fault, then says it becomes him.
The apparent defect is already being reassessed before Rudabeh speaks. The English correctly preserves the reversal inside Mehrab’s own appraisal; the later maidens do not invent that change in value.
22–27Passion and a transmitted warning about hearingFuller printed support
Ganjoor moves from Rudabeh’s flushed face to her sleepless longing. Mohl p 125 additionally prints the warning not to praise men before women and its Div-and-heart explanation. Moscow p 160 places this warning in brackets.
English 26–27 therefore has printed Persian support. The warning is a gnomic intrusion into the love narrative, not evidence that Rudabeh is literally possessed. Its distrust of women’s hearing sits provocatively beside the heroine’s discerning account of why she loves.
28–36A secret entrusted to five women
The five Turk attendants hear a confession of love and a request for a remedy. The English anticipates the later argument that the love arose from report and worth, stated again at 60–61.
The repeated justification is a redistribution of the heroine’s case, not two different first encounters. Her choice precedes the servants’ intervention; they facilitate it after being persuaded.
37–49The attendants turn difference into unfitnessReported prejudice; local place-name difference
Their objection combines reputation, filial honor, white hair and bird fosterage. Ganjoor names Qannuj and Rai in the portrait’s circulation; Mohl p 126 instead prints Mai, supporting the English against Ganjoor’s Rai.
The hostile account is the attendants’ speech. The place-name difference has a specific printed defense and should remain visible rather than being silently harmonized to the digital reference. The solar suitor is extravagant praise, not a literal new character in the marriage plot.
50–61Worth over conventional preference
Rudabeh rejects the alternatives of Caesar, Faghfur and Iranian kings. Mohl pp 126–127 additionally prints the star/moon, rose/clay and bitter-medicine analogies absent from Ganjoor’s shorter answer.
English 53–55 belongs to a fuller Persian argument. It gives the heroine a language of preference rather than treating attraction as an unreasoning fall from duty. Her explicit turn toward honar, worth or excellence, supports the English’s central defense.
62–72Loyalty becomes a practical undertaking
The attendants offer secrecy, enchantment, bird-flight and deer-like running; Rudabeh promises a ruby-bearing tree as reward.
The impossible motions express readiness to find a means. The English lets the promise acquire narrative momentum without requiring the servants to become actual sorceresses. The reward tree joins action, future abundance and gratitude.
New Naqqali