Fereydoon Receives a Message from Salm and Tur
The court receives the second envoy with honor while the narrator exposes the attempted purchase of absolution.
The chapter in five texts
| Text | Chapter treatment and distinctive choices |
|---|---|
| F&R English | Twenty-five couplets expand reception and make the exchange between diplomatic skill and moral evasion explicit. |
| Moscow | The second embassy again distinguishes an honored bearer from the guilt of his principals. |
| Mohl | Pp 87–88 retain the royal display and the narrator’s criticism of the ransom-like gifts. |
| Ganjoor | Sh13.34–57 provides the reception in 24 couplets; English separates several actions. |
| Khaleghi | The main-text reception exposes concealment and blood-price language while maintaining courtly protocol. |
Parallel text
English left · Persian right. Ganjoor is the reference except where a row names a printed source. Select a number to open the relevant note. G identifiers distinguish digital sections across chapter boundaries.
Narrative and poetic form
The chapter’s restraint is valuable. Its judgment comes through the source’s distinction between eloquent presentation and truthful accounting, without requiring extra denunciation in every note.
Couplet commentary
Quoted text · evidence · interpretation1–9A court with two generations on display
The envoy arrives with gifts; Fereydoon and crowned Manuchehr sit together amid nobles and animals of royal power.
The staging answers the petition before any words do: succession is visible and secure. The English gives the young king an unmistakable place beside the old one.
10–17Courtesy survives the dispute
Shapur brings the envoy in, a golden seat is provided and formal blessings are exchanged.
The king’s hospitality does not pre-judge the message. The English preserves the dignity of reception, avoiding a simplistic equivalence between righteous anger and abuse of a messenger.
18–25A ransom for blood
The source explicitly describes concealment of truth, excuses for the deed and the attempted buying back of the father’s blood through rich gifts. The lock-and-key image introduces the answer.
The narrator’s evaluation differs from the envoy’s polished rhetoric. The English makes that division particularly clear: eloquence can deliver a message well while delivering a morally inadequate case.
New Naqqali