Fereydoon Answers His Sons
Fereydoon refuses pardon, then the returning envoy’s description of Manuchehr’s power turns failed diplomacy into mobilization for war.
The chapter in five texts
| Text | Chapter treatment and distinctive choices |
|---|---|
| F&R English | Ninety couplets retain the extended refusal and give the returning envoy’s report room to develop into a strategic turning point. |
| Moscow | The refusal and report lead into mobilization; the envoy’s return is distinct from the king’s own words. |
| Mohl | Pp 88–92 offer fuller refusal material as well as the court report. Selected anchors are quoted rather than presented as a complete new Persian edition. |
| Ganjoor | Sh13.58–128 is shorter around the refusal and differs in details of the supporting roster. |
| Khaleghi | The main narrative carries the refusal and report, with local inclusions and name readings requiring their own evidence. |
Parallel text
English left · Persian right. Ganjoor is the reference except where a row names a printed source. Select a number to open the relevant note. G identifiers distinguish digital sections across chapter boundaries.
Narrative and poetic form
The translation’s long report is narratively earned: it makes the coming war arise from observed strength and a failed appeal. The notes preserve that force while distinguishing fuller speech, additional names and genuinely shared events.
Couplet commentary
Quoted text · evidence · interpretation1–10The sun cannot be hidden
The answer begins with the impossibility of concealing the sun and asks where Iraj’s body is before accepting professed affection for Manuchehr.
The English gives the refusal a factual core. An unaccounted-for murdered brother outweighs declarations of affection; the promised meeting will occur only under arms.
11–21The tree grows a new branch
The source names the avenging army and explains why vengeance was delayed until a branch of Iraj’s uprooted tree could grow. English expands the military prospect.
Delay is not forgetfulness. The father distinguishes a war against his own sons from a descendant’s claim for his murdered ancestor; the English makes the succession logic explicit without erasing its human cost.
22–29Against the excuses
The longer English answer explicitly rejects heavenly causation as a cleansing of brother-blood. Mohl pp 88–89 has a fuller refusal here than Ganjoor’s transition from the new branch to the envoy’s departure.
The verse should be read as the father’s rebuttal to the preceding petition. Explanations may identify influences without removing moral accountability. Selected printed wording below anchors that stance; the display does not claim eight fresh one-to-one Persian equivalents.
30–37Blood is not for sale
Mohl’s fuller answer on pp 88–89 rejects treasure as compensation for the murdered son. Ganjoor’s sh13 does not separately reproduce this extended exchange.
The father refuses to price a life through gifts. This is why the earlier treasure catalog matters: its material abundance cannot accomplish the moral work the senders need. The English’s rhetorical questions dramatize that refusal.
38–52The envoy reads the balance of power
The envoy leaves trembling, returns to the two kings and is questioned about the court, the heir, his counselors, army and treasure.
The scene gives an observant messenger intellectual agency. His fear is informed by what he has seen; the English retains a movement from personal impression to strategic report.
53–67A court described as a cosmos
Paradisal ground, high palace, elephants, lions, music, the old king and the young heir fill the report.
These images are persuasive speech grounded in spectacle. The comparison with Jamshid and Tahmuras locates royal power in the epic’s own memory; it should not be translated into an assertion that the dead rulers literally returned.
68–77Who sustains the young king
Ganjoor names Gharan, Sarv, Garshasp as treasurer, Shirviyeh and Shapur. English adds Kaveh in person and names Gashasb. The roster is not identical.
The English gives the coalition a family and institutional history, but a note should not assign the added Kaveh appearance to the digital passage. Name-forms and expanded rosters require local evidence, not an automatic assumption that similar-looking names are interchangeable.
78–90Failure of counsel, choice of war
The report is followed by the kings’ distress, Tur’s fear of a growing lion cub and rapid recruitment from Chin and Khavar.
Their own envoy confirms the capacity they tried to deny. The English preserves the choice of pre-emptive violence as a decision, not an irresistible command of destiny. The chapter closes by converting all the earlier rhetoric into marching armies.
New Naqqali