Gharan Takes the Castle of the Alanons
A captured signet opens a fortress. The narrator’s warning about credulity complicates the victors’ successful deception.
The chapter in five texts
| Text | Chapter treatment and distinctive choices |
|---|---|
| F&R English | Fifty-four couplets preserve the fuller cautionary counsel and a night signal, while shifting initial strategic initiative to Manuchehr. |
| Moscow | The sea-fort stratagem includes bracketed cautionary material; the local editorial layout distinguishes retained narrative from qualified passages. |
| Mohl | Pp 97–99 retain the fuller leopard-cub warning, nightfall signal and twelve-thousand figure. |
| Ganjoor | Sh19 has 45 couplets. It gives the first thought to Gharan, a dawn signal and an uncounted slaughter. |
| Khaleghi | The corresponding fortress narrative remains in the main text; local placement, apparatus additions and strategic attribution are not collapsed into a single claim of identity. |
Parallel text
English left · Persian right. Ganjoor is the reference except where a row names a printed source. Select a number to open the relevant note. G identifiers distinguish digital sections across chapter boundaries.
Narrative and poetic form
Two different conclusions are needed: the night signal and number have printed support, while initial agency differs from the digital reference. That discriminating account gives the English a stronger defense than an assertion that every apparent difference is either an error or poetic license.
Couplet commentary
Quoted text · evidence · interpretation1–10Who conceives the plan?Agency difference
Ganjoor 4 attributes the initial fortress calculation to Gharan. English 4–10 first gives the strategic idea to Manuchehr, who then tells Gharan. The inaccessible sea-fort and need to forestall Salm are shared.
This is a real shift in initiative, not merely expansion. The English strengthens the young king’s strategic role; the digital reference gives that particular first thought to his general. The poem is retained with the attribution visible.
11–19The signet and a concealed expedition
Gharan asks for troops, the royal banner and Tur’s signet, then moves toward the sea with Gashasb/Garshasp and the concealed force. English supplies a six-thousand figure absent from these six digital couplets.
The signet is a material credential separated from its dead owner. The English keeps both the plan’s military force and its documentary deception; neither element alone would explain the capture.
20–31A true seal authenticates a false message
The army is left with Shirviyeh; Gharan enters as an envoy and presents a message under Tur’s seal. The castellan opens the gate.
The credential is genuine while the communication is false. That distinction explains the vulnerability more exactly than calling the guard simply gullible. Royal signs can be appropriated by an enemy.
32–44The narrator warns against sweet speech
The dehqan’s advice, need for thought alongside service and contrast of cunning and simplicity are shared. Mohl p 99 supplies the fuller leopard-cub counsel about examining unknown affairs; Ganjoor compresses the warning.
The narrator does not merely applaud clever victors. He asks the reader to consider the defeated guard’s error. The English’s fuller counsel preserves an uneasy ethical perspective within an otherwise successful stratagem.
45–54A timing difference and a counted slaughterMohl supports timing and number
Ganjoor 35 says “when night became day”; English 45 says “when night grew black.” Mohl p 99 reads چو شب تیره شد and therefore supports the English night signal. Mohl’s close also gives twelve thousand dead, where Ganjoor says beyond count.
The English is not at fault merely for differing from the digital reference. Both timing and number can be traced to the fuller printed presentation. The destruction is still a massacre in scale, not a bloodless trick.
New Naqqali