Fereydoon Tests His Sons
Fereydoon’s dragon disguise reveals three dispositions; naming and astrology then turn characterization into the architecture of the coming tragedy.
The chapter in five texts
| Text | Chapter treatment and distinctive choices |
|---|---|
| F&R English | Fifty-two couplets preserve the full dragon test, six names and ominous astrology. Earth/fire and the planetary assignments have specific printed support. |
| Moscow | The printed reign includes the dragon-and-naming sequence before partition; its local readings should be checked independently of the digital text. |
| Mohl | Pp 68–70 retain the scene. Jupiter and Sun support the English astrology; the middle-way image reads water/fire. |
| Ganjoor | The entire dragon, naming and astrology sequence is absent between sh4 and sh5 in the captured poem body. |
| Khaleghi | Pp 103–106 retain the scene. Earth/fire supports English 37; Saturn/Mars and its Aries reading for Iraj differ from the English’s Mohl-supported configuration. |
Parallel text
English left · Persian right. Ganjoor is the reference except where a row names a printed source. Select a number to open the relevant note. G identifiers distinguish digital sections across chapter boundaries.
Narrative and poetic form
This chapter offers a particularly clear defense of the translation’s fuller narrative. What looks like a substantial addition against Ganjoor is printed Persian narrative, while its most technical detail can be traced to a specific edition rather than excused vaguely as poetic freedom.
Couplet commentary
Quoted text · evidence · interpretation1–8A father in dragon form
Mohl p 68 and Khaleghi p 103 narrate Fereydoon’s disguise as a fire-breathing dragon in the princes’ road. The dragon test is absent from Ganjoor’s reign sequence.
The English carries an established episode. Its dramatic function is diagnostic: the father produces an apparent danger to discover his sons’ responses, unlike Sarv’s earlier attempt to destroy his guests.
9–17Retreat, attack and a measured challenge
Mohl pp 68–69 and Khaleghi p 104 contrast the eldest’s withdrawal, the middle son’s armed aggression and the youngest’s spoken challenge. The youngest declares their royal identity.
The youngest does not merely split the difference between cowardice and force: he interprets the encounter and speaks accordingly. The English preserves that distinction, which makes the later preference for Iraj legible before inheritance becomes disputed.
18–28Disguise disclosed after royal reception
The printed scene moves from the king’s altered appearance to the procession, embraces, return to the palace and explanation of the test.
The renewed royal display distinguishes the apparent beast from the recognizable father. The English retains both sides of kingship—power that can terrify and care that can embrace—without making the test an actual attempted murder.
29–37Naming by dispositionPrinted variant supports English
Mohl p 69 explains Salm through safety, Tur through ardor and Iraj through measured conduct. Khaleghi p 105 has the youngest choosing a middle way between earth and fire; Mohl has water and fire. English 37’s “earth and fire” therefore has direct printed support.
These are literary explanations of names within the tale, not established historical etymologies. The English intelligently retains a father’s qualified praise of all three sons: prudent retreat can be sensible, courage has its place, and Iraj excels through proportion.
38–44Sons and brides receive names
Mohl pp 69–70 and Khaleghi pp 105–106 name Iraj and the three brides: Arezu, Mah-e Azadeh and Sahi. Canopus supplies the closing celestial image.
The chapter completes the naming anticipated earlier in Persian. The brides’ individual names matter after the diplomacy has repeatedly spoken of them as a group. Naming dignifies the family arrangement while preparing its later fragmentation.
45–52Two different planetary readingsMohl supports English astrology
Mohl p 70 gives Salm Sagittarius/Jupiter, Tur Leo/Sun and Iraj Cancer/Moon. English 48–50 follows these. Khaleghi p 106 instead has Saturn for Salm and Mars for Tur; for Iraj it prints حمل, Aries, with the Moon. War remains in Iraj’s forecast. These are distinct textual configurations, not one identical chart.
The English astrology is not an invented embellishment or a straightforward astronomical error. It follows a printed textual configuration that differs from Khaleghi’s. These are the poem’s prognostic signs, not a modern natal-chart calculation. The father’s distress anticipates tragedy without canceling the sons’ responsibility.
New Naqqali