Sarv Tests Fereydoon’s Sons
Sarv’s second test is a lethal magical frost. Its defeat leads to marriage, departure and a narrator’s correction of the father’s anger at having daughters.
The chapter in five texts
| Text | Chapter treatment and distinctive choices |
|---|---|
| F&R English | Thirty-six couplets retain the frost trial and distinguish Sarv’s complaint from the narrator’s equal valuation of worthy children. |
| Moscow | The fuller marriage narrative preserves testing material; its printed presentation must be distinguished from the digital omission. |
| Mohl | Pp 66–67 retain the magical frost, countermeasure and departure, including the female-or-male maxim. |
| Ganjoor | Sh4.11–24 covers marriage and departure, omitting the frost but retaining the counterstatement about worthy daughters and sons. |
| Khaleghi | Pp 101–102 print the frost trial in the main text. P 103 brackets the female-or-male maxim. |
Parallel text
English left · Persian right. Ganjoor is the reference except where a row names a printed source. Select a number to open the relevant note. G identifiers distinguish digital sections across chapter boundaries.
Narrative and poetic form
The English’s breadth is well motivated by the transmitted story. Its strongest ethical feature is that it lets a father’s embittered speech meet an answering voice rather than presenting a single, undifferentiated attitude to daughters.
Couplet commentary
Quoted text · evidence · interpretation1–8Hospitality turned dangerous
Khaleghi p 101 and Mohl pp 66–67 print the banquet, garden sleeping arrangements and Sarv’s preparation of magic. Ganjoor omits this intervening trial.
The English gives the host’s action a darker force than the earlier identification game. Food and comfortable lodging become the means of exposing guests to danger; apparent hospitality cannot be equated with safety.
9–17Frost defeated by princely knowledge
The printed passage describes freezing water and destruction of birds, the sons’ recognition of the danger, their counter-enchantment and the king’s disappointed morning inspection.
The princes’ success is explicitly associated with divine farr, royal knowledge and resourcefulness. The episode is not merely an English metaphor for a cold welcome. Its potentially fatal stakes distinguish Sarv’s trial from Fereydoon’s later disguise.
18–26Consent and a father’s bitter complaint
Ganjoor resumes with marriage preparations and Sarv’s lament over parting with daughters. The source gives Sarv the angry comparison between daughters and sons.
The English can retain the harshness because it belongs to a particular wounded speaker. An analyzer should neither endorse the misogynistic complaint nor erase it; the narrator’s answer follows within the chapter.
27–32The departing bridal train
The treasure, brides, escorts and twenty loaded mounts belong to the reference departure. The English broadens its ceremonial movement.
The women are dynastic persons as well as objects of exchange. The language of splendor preserves the social stakes, while the preceding distress prevents an uncomplicated reading of the marriage as an entirely joyful transaction.
33–36A narrator answers the preference for sonsSpeaker and bracket status
Ganjoor explicitly says a child endowed with character and farr is dear whether female or male. Khaleghi p 103 brackets this couplet; Mohl p 67 prints the same equal valuation. The party then turns toward Fereydoon.
This statement belongs to the narrator, not Sarv’s still-bitter complaint. The English preserves an important internal countervoice: the story does not leave the father’s preference for sons as its final ethical judgment.
New Naqqali