Sahm Comes to Manuchehr
A champion’s triumphant report becomes the prelude to an order against a whole lineage. Military service makes the coming conflict of obligations sharper.
The chapter in five texts
| Text | Chapter treatment and distinctive choices |
|---|---|
| F&R English | Fifty-seven couplets retain a fuller campaign report and the royal command that creates a collective danger. |
| Moscow | Pp 194–198 retain the audience; substantial battle narrative at pp 194–197 is bracketed rather than simply absent. |
| Mohl | Pp 150–152 support the added genealogy and larger army figure in the retrospective report. |
| Ganjoor | Sh14.36–85 provides the shorter continuous report and the same destructive command. |
| Khaleghi | The audience and command are consulted within pp 222–226, with critical presentation distinct from the larger transmitted narrative. |
Parallel text
English left · Persian right. Ganjoor is the reference except where a row names a printed source. Select a number to open the relevant note. G identifiers distinguish digital sections across chapter boundaries.
Narrative and poetic form
The English makes an important structural connection: proven service precedes an order that the same champion must learn to question. Its fuller martial account increases the cost of dissent without making the order just.
Couplet commentary
Quoted text · evidence · interpretation1–10Recognition followed by a report
The king seats Sahm beside him and asks about the campaign. Sahm says the enemies are not merely Divs but fighters comparable to lions, faster than horses and braver than Iranian warriors.
The English preserves the praise of hostile strength within the champion’s own report. Div-language should not erase the passage’s explicit recognition of formidable opponents.
11–25A fuller account changes the campaign’s texture
The enemy sallies, the troops fear, Sahm restores courage and the hostile multitude fills the terrain. Mohl p 150 adds introductory fighting and the Kakouy genealogy through Salm and Zahhak, beyond Ganjoor’s shorter sequence.
English 19–20 follows that fuller genealogy rather than inventing parentage to rhyme. The recurring name Kakouy should not by itself be used to identify this opponent with every earlier similarly named fighter. The report remains Sahm’s retrospective self-presentation.
26–36Arrow and girdle-lift defeat the chieftain
A lasso attack is evaded; steel-headed arrows strike the helmet; the opponent closes with an Indian sword; Sahm takes his belt and throws him down.
The English lets a sequence of different martial skills remain distinct. The anvil-head image magnifies resistance and force, while the belt-lift anticipates the son’s later performance at court. It is not necessary to turn every impossible bodily detail into naturalistic combat reporting.
37–44Victory counted and celebratedFuller report; editorial qualification
Ganjoor counts twelve thousand fallen. Mohl p 152 additionally prints the force of three hundred thousand and the credit to royal fortune, corresponding to English 40–41. Moscow pp 194–197 places much of the expanded battle report within brackets.
The English’s larger army number is printed tradition, not an inference from twelve thousand deaths. Such figures establish epic scale and should not be presented as independently verified military statistics.
45–53The order extends beyond the lovers
At the next audience Manuchehr commands the burning of Kabul and Mehrab’s palace and the killing of associated nobles and Zahhak kin.
The English correctly makes the collective scope unmistakable. This is not merely a request to separate two young people. The breadth of the threatened destruction gives Sindokht’s later distinction between rulers and innocent inhabitants its ethical force.
54–57Obedience postpones the champion’s petition
Sahm answers that he will obey, bows and departs. The English makes explicit that the angry command prevents his intended intervention.
His answer is a genuine obligation he has accepted, however unwillingly. The following change of course must therefore be understood as a conflict between service, paternal promise and justice, not as proof that the order was never issued.
New Naqqali