Sahm Marches on Kabul
Zal interposes his own body between Kabul and destruction. His appeal tests Sahm’s reputation for justice against the son to whom he has repeatedly done wrong.
The chapter in five texts
| Text | Chapter treatment and distinctive choices |
|---|---|
| F&R English | Fifty-seven couplets bring abandonment, maternal grief and a threatened city into one argument, ending in a renewed paternal undertaking. |
| Moscow | Pp 198–201 retain confrontation and concession with bracketed amplifications. |
| Mohl | Pp 152–155 support the fuller appeal and reassurance around the proposed letter. |
| Ganjoor | Sh15.1–51 supplies the chapter; “no quarrel” differs from English “No equal.” |
| Khaleghi | The father-and-son confrontation is consulted within pp 226–231. |
Parallel text
English left · Persian right. Ganjoor is the reference except where a row names a printed source. Select a number to open the relevant note. G identifiers distinguish digital sections across chapter boundaries.
Narrative and poetic form
The chapter’s defense is strongest in its ethical structure. Zal’s bravery is the willingness to be harmed in place of others, and his father’s answer begins by admitting wrong. The local no-quarrel/no-equal shift should remain candidly recorded.
Couplet commentary
Quoted text · evidence · interpretation1–10Resistance begins before the petition
News reaches Kabul; Zal declares that any destroying dragon must take his head first, then rides to his father and receives a ceremonial welcome.
The English expands the alarm into the named household’s fear. The dragon image now attaches to the force threatening Kabul, reversing the easy assumption that every use of dragon-language condemns Mehrab’s family.
11–19Reverence does not cancel disagreement
Zal dismounts, hears warnings about his father’s anger and replies that wisdom can contain the dispute in words; shame can be answered by tears.
The English preserves the embodied protocol while allowing resistance. Its contrast between crowned chiefs and seekers of crowns interprets the source’s two groups around the commander; the important action is that all acknowledge rank before the confrontation.
20–27Praise ends in an exception
The blessing and martial praise culminate in the claim that everyone receives Sahm’s justice except his own son.
The English’s pacing gives the accusation a strong turn rather than introducing it abruptly. Public renown and private failure are measured against the same word, justice, so the son argues from the father’s professed values.
28–36Innocence and the mother’s griefLocal shift from no quarrel to no equal
Ganjoor 30 says that the bird-reared, dust-fed son has no quarrel with anyone; English 28 gives “No equal.” The next source lines recall abandonment, the mother’s distress and the black/white challenge to the Creator.
The complaint’s moral force is innocence, not superiority. The English’s “No equal” can instead suggest unrivaled prowess and therefore changes the local assertion. The mother’s grief is explicitly Persian, not a modern emotional addition to a father-and-son story.
37–46A prosperous house and an offered body
The source invokes treasure, throne, counsel, obedience at Kabul, the former promise and the threatened ruin. Zal offers to be sawn in two rather than have Kabul discussed as a target.
The English identifies the splendid household with Mehrab and makes the sacrifice strikingly clear. Its “when I am dead” extends the source’s demand to cease speaking of Kabul; the core action remains substitution of the son’s vulnerable body for an endangered community.
47–52The father admits the charge
Sahm raises his ears and lowers his mane, acknowledges wrong and proposes a letter carried by Zal.
The animal posture is a transmitted image of changed bearing. The English rightly leaves the admission uncompromising: this is not a claim that the original abandonment was justified by a favorable eventual outcome.
53–57A renewed path remains conditional
Sahm promises to recall the necessary arguments and turn the king toward justice. Ganjoor makes success conditional on the world-ruler’s cooperation; Mohl p 155 carries additional reassurance and the lion’s-work close.
The English gives the renewed promise an encouraging cadence while retaining “If he consents.” It should be defended as a commitment to act and plead, not a guarantee that Sahm can command the Shah’s decision.
New Naqqali