Manuchehr’s Answer to Sahm’s Letter
Written royal consent travels outward, transforming anxiety in both households into a publicly prepared welcome. Mehrab explicitly credits Sindokht’s judgment for the reversal.
The chapter in five texts
| Text | Chapter treatment and distinctive choices |
|---|---|
| F&R English | Forty-nine couplets retain the royal answer, message relay, explicit credit to Sindokht and fuller preparations for the visit. |
| Moscow | Pp 227–230 retain the answer and preparations with local bracketed additions. |
| Mohl | Pp 170–172 support the expanded chamber and road preparations after the credit to Sindokht. |
| Ganjoor | Sh22 has 44 couplets, including one regional supply-list couplet shown as source-only. |
| Khaleghi | The answer and Kabul preparation are consulted within pp 255–258. |
Parallel text
English left · Persian right. Ganjoor is the reference except where a row names a printed source. Select a number to open the relevant note. G identifiers distinguish digital sections across chapter boundaries.
Narrative and poetic form
The English’s most important fidelity is attribution: the king permits, the father communicates, the queen plans and the daughter acknowledges. A successful marriage has required several different kinds of action.
Couplet commentary
Quoted text · evidence · interpretation1–10The written answer makes consent portable
Manuchehr praises father and son, records that the wish is granted and sends Zal away with a blessing.
The English maintains the epistolary form and the continuity between Sahm’s service and Zal’s promise. Its lion-and-leopard ancestry simile is a source-based compliment, not a literal biological lineage.
11–19News moves faster than the returning bridegroom
Zal sends a rider to Sahm; the rejuvenated father sends a further message to Kabul and promises the joint visit when Zal arrives.
The English correctly preserves the relay of knowledge. The households can prepare before the physical reunion because messengers, letters and people travel at different points in the sequence.
20–27Mehrab names the person who saved the situation
The delighted ruler summons Sindokht, credits her counsel for lighting the dark place, praises the branch she reached and opens the treasury again.
This is explicit attribution of political accomplishment to the queen. The English does not have to manufacture a modern tribute: the husband himself names her plan and asks her to complete the work.
28–33Mother and daughter honor reciprocal agency
Sindokht tells Rudabeh that she has attained her chosen equal; the daughter answers with praise and promises obedience.
The English retains both the daughter’s determined choice and the mother’s successful action. Gratitude need not cancel the earlier resistance, nor does the happy outcome prove that the mother’s first violence was right.
34–40The palace becomes an argument in materials
Halls, perfumes, gold-work, pearls and ruby-footed thrones make the welcome visible. Ganjoor’s separate regional supply list at 39 has no distinct English inventory and is displayed as source-only.
The English keeps the opulence’s ceremonial purpose. The craftsmen’s style of Chin is a cultural association of luxury workmanship, not an attribution to an identified surviving workshop.
41–49Private adornment leads into a public approach
Rudabeh is adorned, Kabul decorated and minstrels mounted on elephants. Mohl p 172 additionally carries a guarded-chamber detail and the extended road preparation corresponding to the fuller English ending.
The preparation does not make Rudabeh a passive object retroactively: the bride now being ceremonially presented is the woman whose refusal of other suitors began the process. The public welcome completes what the first secret meeting could not achieve.
New Naqqali