Rostam Proudly Writes His Father
The conquest is reported, praised, emptied of treasure and burned. The return restores the son to parental affection without undoing what his victory has cost elsewhere.
The chapter in five texts
| Text | Chapter treatment and distinctive choices |
|---|---|
| F&R English | Thirty-nine couplets retain both letters, the hoard, the order to burn Sepand and the return to Rudabeh and Zal. |
| Moscow | Appendix X, pp 269–271, preserves the reporting and return sequence. |
| Mohl | Pp 187–188 print the exchange and aftermath continuously. |
| Ganjoor | No corresponding chapter in the captured digital Manuchehr sequence. |
| Khaleghi | The below-main-text record on pp 279–280 preserves the correspondence, quantities, burning and homecoming. |
Parallel text
English left · Mohl Persian reference right. Ganjoor has no counterpart to this chapter. Local w3–w6 numbers identify the Mohl reference; the digital transcription was checked against the printed passage and obvious transcription errors corrected. Full printed witnesses are linked in the notes.
Mohl digital transcription aid ↗
Narrative and poetic form
The English’s strongest fidelity is the link between letter and consequence: the father’s praise carries an order, and the son obeys it. The maternal reception then gives the return a human scale without reversing the preceding destruction.
Couplet commentary
Quoted text · evidence · interpretation1–6Royal and celestial language in the son’s letter
The opening invokes sun, snake and ant, the named celestial powers and the raised sky, then praises Zal as Iran’s support and a maker and unmaker of kings.
The English retains a hierarchy spanning tiny creatures and the heavens. Nahid, Bahram and Mehr in this invocation are celestial names, not three human warriors. The exalted kingmaking language is filial praise of the champion’s political office, not an account of a new deposition he performs here.
7–15A compressed report changes emphasisReported victory and epic quantities
The letter retells entry and fighting, then gives five hundred thousand kharvar of silver and gold and an uncountable range of goods. Its description of slain, wounded and fled is less sweeping than the preceding narrator’s fatal search.
The English preserves a difference already internal to the fuller narrative: an interested report compresses what readers have just seen. A kharvar is a traditional load or weight unit; a modern tonnage conversion would make epic hyperbole falsely precise. “Words I read” in English 8 adds a written quality to the initial greeting, previously delivered through an envoy.
16–26Paternal praise commands destruction
Zal rejoices, praises a child’s adult deed, recalls Nariman and orders choice treasure loaded before the fort is burned. The reprint and the critical records retain an enormous caravan expression, thousands upon thousands.
The English makes the command’s logic unmistakable. Revenge belongs to the father’s stated purpose. “A thousand thousand” gives the numerical idiom a fixed million; its scale should be read as monumental abundance, not a reconstructed transport capacity.
27–32Treasure moves before the fort burns
Rostam selects jewels, insignia, weapons and Chinese textiles, sends them ahead, burns Sepand and rides home.
The English keeps appropriation and destruction in their order. Its triumphant tempo is appropriate to the received tale’s voice, while the commentary can still distinguish narratorial celebration from an ethical endorsement of every act.
33–39The returning son first bows to his mother
The welcome is prepared; Rostam comes to Rudabeh, bows and is kissed on shoulders and breast before the father’s embrace and largesse.
The English preserves a substantial maternal action after the martial adventure. The mother who survived the birth is present to receive the adult-seeming child. The reconciliation of family affection with destructive achievement is part of the episode’s inherited heroic structure, not a contradiction to be erased by removing either side.
New Naqqali