New Naqqaliشاهنامه
The Bilingual Poem · A9

The Birth and Early Feats of Rostam; Manuchehr’s Closing Counsel

7 chapters · 377 couplets · 50 commentary notes

Chapters

About this commentary

Rudabeh · The Simorgh · Rostam · Sahm · Manuchehr

A hero enters; a king departs

Seven chapters, 377 English couplets and 50 commentary entries. All 754 English lines remain unchanged. The sequence moves from Rudabeh’s perilous delivery through the young hero’s first feats to the final counsel and death of Manuchehr, completing the A section.

Read the comparison method and source limits

F&R is an English verse translation; Moscow, Mohl and Khaleghi are edited Persian texts; Ganjoor is a digital presentation. These are five comparison texts, not five independent manuscript witnesses. Agreement is not an independent manuscript vote.

The complete Ganjoor poem-body reference comprises Manuchehr sh25–sh28, locally identified as m25–m28: 41, 49, 63 and 37 couplets, total 190. All are represented once across A9.1, A9.2 and A9.7. A separate preparation transition in sh26.18 is shown as source-only. Modern prose summaries and reader comments are excluded. English and Persian blocks align by sense.

A9.3–A9.6 are fuller-tradition chapters absent from that digital sequence. Mohl prints them continuously at pp 182–189; Moscow preserves them in Appendix X at pp 264–272; Khaleghi records them below the main text across pp 275–281. For these four chapters the right-hand column supplies the full Mohl reference: 73, 47, 39 and 19 couplets, total 178. A Wikisource transcription provided the typing basis; the passages were checked in the inspected reprint and visible transcription errors corrected. The local w3–w6 numbers are reference identifiers, not Mohl’s continuous verse numbers. Wikisource is a transcription aid, not a sixth independent comparison text. Every reference couplet appears once, and every English couplet is covered by one note.

Bracketed main-text material, a separately numbered appendix and below-main-text preservation are distinct editorial statuses. A story being absent from the running text does not mean that an edition supplies no access to it. Narrative extent and selected readings were checked against the linked scans; this is not an exhaustive manuscript collation, complete apparatus transcription or external peer-review certification. Chapter consultation spans can overlap. Quoted spelling and spacing are lightly normalized.

The notes defend source-supported English and identify local shifts without rewriting the poem. Literary descriptions of delivery, growth and healing are discussed as narrative rather than certified medical or historical evidence. The gatekeeper’s death, destruction at Sepand and family praise are all retained in the analysis. This is a comparative commentary, not a new rhyme or metrical audit.

Principal findings. The early feats are transmitted Persian stories, with distinct editorial placements. “I am delivered” preserves the birth-and-relief force of the naming. Mohl and Khaleghi support three escort stages against Ganjoor’s two. The Moses prophecy is transmitted, but Moscow brackets it and Khaleghi records it in the apparatus. The commentary preserves both the heroic achievement and its ethically difficult actions.

Source and editorial record

Evidence behind the comparison

Bibliography and consulted presentations
TextEdition and access
F&R EnglishFarzad and Rhonda Dibachi, Shahnameh, A9.1–A9.7, New Naqqali. Captured website text: 377 couplets / 754 lines.

Consult source ↗

MoscowFerdowsi, Shahnameh: Critical Text, vol. I, under E. E. Bertels. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1960. Main-text consultation pp 235–248; Appendix X pp 264–272 for the early feats. Image number = printed page + 1. The appendix and brackets are identified locally.

Consult source ↗

MohlFerdowsi, Shahnameh, ed. Jules Mohl, vol. I. Tehran pocket reprint, Sherkat-e Sahami-ye Ketabha-ye Jibi with Franklin Publications, second printing 1354 SH. Consulted pp 175–191; early feats run continuously at pp 182–189. This is the inspected Persian reprint, not the first Paris impression. PDF page = printed page + 4.

Consult source ↗

GanjoorFerdowsi, Shahnameh, Manuchehr sh25–sh28. Captured poem-body counts 41, 49, 63 and 37, total 190. No separate elephant/Sepand/letter chapters between the visit and final counsel in this captured sequence.

Consult source ↗

Mohl transcription aidWikisource, Shahnameh (Mohl), four linked early-feat pages: elephant, Sepand, Rostam’s letter and Zal’s letter. Typing basis for local w3–w6; corrected against the printed reprint, including the two separate reply couplets merged in the online Sepand transcription. The transcribed ancient verse is distinguished from modern editorial apparatus.

Consult source ↗

KhaleghiFerdowsi, Shahnameh, ed. Jalal Khaleghi-Motlagh, vol. I. Tehran: Centre for the Great Islamic Encyclopaedia, sixth printing 1396 SH. Consulted pp 265–282. Early-feat record below the main text at pp 275–281; Moses prophecy in the apparatus at p 281. PDF page = printed page + 16.

Consult source ↗

Alignment and coverage

All 377 English couplets and all 190 Ganjoor reference couplets are accounted for once. One Persian couplet appears as source-only. A9.3–A9.6 additionally account for all 178 couplets of the displayed Mohl reference. Together the reference contains 368 Persian couplets, aligned by sense rather than equal line count. Printed excerpts supply evidence for fuller material without creating a supposedly definitive composite Persian edition.

ChapterScopeReference distribution
A9.197 English / 90 Gm25 1–41; m26 1–49; includes one source-only preparation transition.
A9.266 English / 63 Gm27 1–63
A9.373 English / 73 MohlFull Mohl reference · w3:1–10, w3:11–20, w3:21–30, w3:31–40, w3:41–48, w3:49–62, w3:63–67, w3:68–73. No Ganjoor counterpart.
A9.446 English / 47 MohlFull Mohl reference · w4:1–5, w4:6–19, w4:20–28, w4:29–36, w4:37–39, w4:40–47. No Ganjoor counterpart.
A9.539 English / 39 MohlFull Mohl reference · w5:1–6, w5:7–15, w5:16–26, w5:27–32, w5:33–39. No Ganjoor counterpart.
A9.619 English / 19 MohlFull Mohl reference · w6:1–7, w6:8–13, w6:14–19. No Ganjoor counterpart.
A9.737 English / 37 Gm28 1–37
Textual findings and qualifications
PassageFindingRecord
A9.1Birth and maternal survivalThe skilled practitioner carries out the Simorgh’s directions; Rudabeh survives and participates in naming. This is literary narrative, not proof of a documented historical operation.
A9.1.47–53Sleep and suturingEnglish changes the order of the two statements relative to Ganjoor, while preserving both sleep and closure of the wound.
A9.1.59The naming speechI am delivered preserves the connection between relief and birth in the poem’s berastam/Rostam explanation without claiming to settle historical etymology.
A9.1.60–66An effigy carries the newsThe silk likeness is sent to Sahm; the living baby is not the object mounted for this delivery. One preparation transition is source-only.
A9.1.95Age/statureEnglish At eight selects an age reading of the compact Persian growth phrase بالای هشت; the note keeps the interpretive issue visible.
A9.2.45–52Joking and political memoryMehrab’s drunken restoration boast echoes the old anxiety over Zahhak’s line. Mohl explicitly marks jest; laughter does not prove an actual restoration plan.
A9.2.65Three escort stages supportedMohl p 182 and Khaleghi p 275 support three against Ganjoor’s two.
A9.3–A9.6Editorial placementMohl prints the early feats continuously. Moscow Appendix X and Khaleghi’s below-main-text record preserve them in qualified positions. Ganjoor lacks the corresponding sequence.
A9.3.17–18The gatekeeper diesThe fuller Persian narrative supports the killing. The independent analysis does not erase it to make the hero’s action wholly admirable.
A9.3–A9.4Salt and strategyThe fort’s need for salt makes the ruse intelligible despite agricultural self-sufficiency; courtesy and real trade enable admission.
A9.4.36–38The fatal searchThe text distinguishes dead and exhausted defenders, then narrates killing those found. No additional census of the earlier market children is invented.
A9.5Letters have consequencesPraise and vengeance carry an instruction to remove selected wealth and burn the fort; the mother’s welcome follows, without undoing the destruction.
A9.6Ancestry and foster careSahm’s lion comparison voices an inheritance argument. It need not erase the actual saving and educational force of foster care in Zal’s history.
A9.7.23–26Moses and editorial statusThe name is transmitted in Ganjoor and Mohl. Moscow p 248 brackets the prophecy; Khaleghi p 281 records it in the apparatus.
A9.7The A section’s closing movementThe king relinquishes a tested crown while denying its permanence; his remaining legacy is remembered counsel.
Attribution and reuse

The English is reproduced for its authors’ requested project. Persian reference text and printed quotations are attributed locally. The Mohl typing basis is the linked Wikisource transcription, with visible errors corrected against the inspected scans; Wikisource supplies its own attribution and reuse terms. Original Persian verse and modern editorial material remain distinct. Scans and full modern apparatuses are linked rather than embedded. Publication-clearance qualifications recorded in the Prologue continue to apply.