Manuchehr Fights Salm and Slays Him
Salm is overtaken by the harvest he helped plant. Manuchehr’s treatment of the defeated army then tests whether vengeance can stop with the guilty.
The chapter in five texts
| Text | Chapter treatment and distinctive choices |
|---|---|
| F&R English | Thirty-nine couplets connect the fuller Kakouy episode to Salm’s flight and preserve the release of ordinary soldiers. |
| Moscow | The pursuit, killing and surrender follow in a continuous sequence, with mercy distinguished from personal vengeance. |
| Mohl | Pp 102–104 retain Salm’s defeat and the army’s plea. |
| Ganjoor | Sh20.1–39 supplies the pursuit and settlement; its stroke-location and final honoring of the surrendered are more specific than the English in different ways. |
| Khaleghi | The main text retains the full moral turn from punitive victory to an end to needless killing. |
Parallel text
English left · Persian right. Ganjoor is the reference except where a row names a printed source. Select a number to open the relevant note. G identifiers distinguish digital sections across chapter boundaries.
Narrative and poetic form
The chapter’s most substantial achievement comes after Salm’s death. The English gives the king space to renounce private appetite and recognize the difference between guilty principals and compelled followers, making restraint part of royal strength.
Couplet commentary
Quoted text · evidence · interpretation1–6A refuge already destroyed
The reference opens with Salm fleeing toward the fortress and finding no boat. English explicitly connects the loss of confidence with Kakouy’s death.
The added causal bridge belongs to the fuller combat sequence just retained. The fortress stratagem now pays off: Salm’s retreat fails because the apparent refuge has already been removed.
7–18The harvest of violenceLocal blow-location difference
The taunt promises Salm the crown and throne he sought, now as punishment. The source’s single stroke falls on the neck; English 14 places it across the royal side before the head is displayed.
The tree, thorn and woven-silk figures make consequence feel self-produced. The body-location differs locally: the English’s split body should not be used to erase the source’s explicit neck-strike. The wider action and responsibility remain intact.
19–28The soldiers distinguish compulsion from desire
The defeated army sends a speaker explaining that its men own herds, fields and homes and came under royal command, not personal hunger for revenge.
The English preserves a crucial moral discrimination between rulers and their ordinary forces. The soldiers’ innocence is their plea; the king’s subsequent action gives that plea practical recognition rather than simply repeating it as an unquestioned premise.
29–36Justice limits retaliation
Manuchehr casts private desire aside and distinguishes guilty from innocent. The main source commands affection, disarmament and an end to killing; the English gives the return-home direction fuller expression.
This is not a reversal of the entire campaign. It is a limit placed upon it: the original murderers have fallen, so revenge must not expand indefinitely into the destruction of their subjects.
37–39The proclamation against further bloodshed
The source orders an end to needless killing, receives the army’s equipment and honors the defeated according to rank. English 39 makes the distribution of equipment to chiefs more explicit.
The ending turns martial victory into a political settlement. Honoring surrendered people matters as much as accumulating arms; the source’s treatment of them should remain visible beside the English emphasis on the material transfer.
New Naqqali